So what if the price of a
cheeseburger goes up? Again, that’s the free market. Pay people a living wage
and maybe they can afford that more expensive hamburger? I have never
understood how American business leaders can justify paying so little to the
American worker and expect them to have the ability to purchase their products?
It seems to me that Americans are currently at a terrible disadvantage in the
manufacturing sector. In China and Mexico, companies can utilize essentially a
slave labor force. These companies like to tout how they pay more than what
these employees made formerly, yet it’s still a substandard wage. All the
while, these corporate titans and their financiers are living like kings and
queens. If you were to take a third of their wealth and distribute it to the
employees, especially those at the bottom, you’d raise their standard of living
a lot, while allowing those at the top to remain filthy rich. How is this
accomplished in a free market society?
As much as I hate to say it, you
either regulate these companies or you don’t allow them to exist in the first
place. I am not a fan of corporate
capitalism. I am all for small businesses. I’m all for anyone building their
business as large as they personally can handle. I am not for corporations,
which are so large that even government has a hard time regulating them. In
fact, these corporations are so large that they can manipulate the government
to the point that it no longer cares about it’s citizens because legislators
are effectively being bought and sold. Just do a Google search for how many
former legislators are now in the lobbying business. Hiring former politicians
as lobbyists is just one way that these giant corporations control them. Paying
gigantic speaking fees to politicians, publishing, then purchasing large
quantities of a politician’s book is another. Most politicians write a book,
get paid large money for it, and corporations purchase large lots of these
books and then warehouse or destroy them. It’s modern day money laundering. It’s
corruption at the highest level. If we didn’t allow corporations to exist, this
sort of corruption wouldn’t be so rampant.
Socialism, which normally leads to
communism, is not the answer either. In most socialist and communist societies,
the people are not as free as they would be in an open capitalistic society,
and they would not have as much incentive to work as hard as they could. I’m
all for taking care of those who cannot take care of themselves. It should be
the civic duty of a compassionate society. I’m also for us as a society to come
together and provide for ourselves a common defense to threats, at home and
abroad, education, legal matters, and healthcare. We should also provide for a
common retirement fund for those who are elderly (Social Security) and means
test it. Not everyone will have built a tidy nest egg for themselves, for
whatever reason. Not everyone who fails to build wealth in life is in that
position because they were lazy. Some yes, but luck plays a large part in doing
well in life too.
There should be basic services, such
as medical, legal, and education, and social insurance that prevents the
elderly and disabled from destitution. In no way should this help be more than
what someone could build for themselves working hard, but it should allow for
basic living expenses with a little cushion.
There are two camps that are coming
out of the political fog right now. It used to be a fight between the left and
the right, conservatism and liberalism, but those battle lines hardly exist
anymore. Now, mainly because of corporate corruption, we are seeing a great
divide between globalists and nationalist. Yes, there are differences between
left and right still, but both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump illustrated the
nationalist movement that is starting to swell in America, nay, the world.
Globalists on both the left and the right have been in lockstep, moving the
world into a borderless planet, where the rich are rich and the poor are poor.
The globalists can move their money around the planet with ease, exploit
resources abroad without hindrance, and ultimately, rule the world.
The wealth and power hungry wolves
will stop at nothing to create this new world order that they’ve sought since
the end of WWII. The taste of blood is upon their lips and they have grown
ravenous. They find it hard to hide their agenda anymore. Anyone who stands in
their way is liable to be mowed down. They have purchased the world’s media to
push their agenda and propaganda. They have created a society that is
destitute, and dependent upon them for survival, even those who work hard. Hard
work rarely gets you ahead in this world any longer, and that is due to the
globalists who have made it so. They have heaped heavy burdens upon the backs
of the middle class, creating enmity between the lower and middle classes while
those at the top pay very little and watch Rome burn while they fiddle.
We are at a crossroads in this
country. We are at a crossroads in the world. It’s one thing if globalism would
have brought prosperity to the citizens of the world, but it hasn’t. It has
spread pollution, destitution, and is a cancer on the whole world.
We must defeat the globalists now or
forever be indentured to them. Technology is getting to be enough that the
elite can watch and control every aspect of a person’s life from abroad. They
can use drones, cameras, data tracking, and computers to keep people in line
and in check. By removing money and making it electronic, they can control your
access to food and other necessities. A cancer is something that keeps growing
and running amok. This is globalism. Like a snake, it’s head must be severed.
A perfect world is one where there are
multiple governments, people all over the world, free and governing themselves.
Each country ought to take care of itself first, then share it’s excesses with
the rest of the world. The world ought to keep other countries in check and
agree to remain separate from one another. Think of AT&T or Standard Oil.
It’s the same thing. Teddy Roosevelt busted them up as he saw the benefit of
many smaller entities instead of one large one. That should be the approach the
world takes to government. Checks and balances. You lose those checks and
balances in a one world government.
No comments:
Post a Comment