Throughout history, there has been a
portion of humanity who wishes to have someone lord over them. If this were not
the case, we wouldn’t have had such large kingdoms created where a monarch or
dictator of one kind or another, has kept a large group of people subservient
to them in exchange for a little food and security. A large portion of the Old
Testament of the bible is devoted to this. The Israelites doubted God and Moses
in the desert and many lamented that they would have been better off in slavery
back in Egypt where they at least had a bite to eat. These same Israelites, who
after gaining their freedom and having a system of judges, demanded a king, and
the Lord warned them. From the book of Samuel;
So
Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking for a king
from him. He said, “These will be the ways of the king who will reign over you:
he will take your sons and appoint them to his chariots and to be his horsemen
and to run before his chariots. And he will appoint for himself commanders of
thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap
his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his
chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He
will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give
them to his servants. He will take the tenth of your grain and of your
vineyards and give it to his officers and to his servants. He will take your
male servants and female servants and the best of your young men and your
donkeys, and put them to his work. He will take the tenth of your flocks, and
you shall be his slaves. And in that day you will cry out because of your king,
whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that
day.”
But
the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel. And they said, “No! But there
shall be a king over us, that we also may be like all the nations, and that our
king may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles.” And when Samuel
had heard all the words of the people, he repeated them in the ears of the
Lord. And the Lord said to Samuel, “Obey their voice and make them a king.”
And a king the Lord gave them, and
all the chains that came with it. Obviously, people have changed very little
since ancient times. In more modern times, our own country made a choice about
whether they wanted a king over them or not. In our case, we had enough of all
the chains that came with having a king and we rebelled and cast our chains off
and became free.
Very much like the scare-mongers of
today in this Brexit vote, during the American Revolution, there were many who wished to remain loyal to the king. I have read
before that the colonies were divided three ways. There was about a third who
wanted independence. A third didn’t care, and a third wished to remain
indentured to the king. Many of the very same arguments were made by those
wishing to remain loyal to the crown that have been made by the Remain camp in
this referendum. These colonial loyalists thought the world was going to end by
our leaving the British Empire. Many of them went back home to England and fled
to Canada.
With the benefit of hindsight, we
now know that those who stayed did not suffer for long. In fact, America would
go on to become the powerhouse that it is today, and it wouldn’t have done that
had it remained chained to England. How different history would have been had
we not gained independence and showed the world a different way to live.
The same thing will happen with a
free United Kingdom. You don’t have to belong to the “global village” in order
to be a part of the global community. In the village, you must do as others
have decided for you. As an independent member of the community, you retain the
freedom to make the correct choices that are best for you.
Who in their right mind would go to
a doctor and allow someone else to make medical decisions for them? Who would
accept legal counsel based upon what may be best for another party? Why then do
we think it’s good to have others decide what’s best for the UK? Shouldn’t the
UK be able to decide what’s best for itself?
This brings out the reality of the
whole situation. This is all about globalism. This isn’t the sort of globalism
where you learn to play nice with your neighbors. This is a form of globalism
where you become part of a commune. Others decide what you get and what you
give up. Others decide what you shall do and not do, all in the name of unity.
How can we teach our daughters to be independent people on one hand, yet be
anything but in our own government affairs? The buzz-word for this new form of
globalism is called progressivism. It’s like an opium for the masses. Those who
subscribe to it are either those who shall become lords over others, or those
who are so intoxicated by its effects that they know not their own poor
condition, like an opium addict. All these poor souls know is that it feels
good. They grow dependent upon the drug of progressivism and get to the point
that they can no longer care for themselves. They turn to the leaders to take
care of them. All the while, the fruits of their labor are taken from them and
their burdens are increased. This must be stopped at all costs.
Freedom comes with great challenges.
The first of which is insecurity. In a free society, the people have the
opportunity to fail. They also have the opportunity to succeed. This is the
beauty of freedom. Under freedom, you have a choice. You have opportunity, real
opportunity, to make something of yourself. You don’t need government to give
you a hand up. Under freedom, you have the opportunity to do it yourself, and
to take pride and profit from the toils of your work. Not everyone succeeds in
a free society. What’s important is that there is at least opportunity.
I remember reading books on the
Civil War and the freeing of the slaves. Many slaves wandered around after the
Civil War, lost, because they didn’t know how to live free. Many of them
returned to their masters and continued on as share croppers. Many in the south
punished the blacks with unfair Jim Crow laws, and kept the blacks in a new
kind of slavery. I read that some slaves, especially those with benevolent
masters, thought their life was better off under slavery than it was after they
were freed because at least they had a roof over their heads and food on their
table. Once they were freed, they no longer had those securities.
This being said, I doubt anyone
would publicly declare today that the slaves were better under slavery than
they were when freed? Instead, slavery is viewed in the eyes of those
slaves who were treated cruelly. Slaves were property and many slaveholders
treated their slaves as part of their families. Even in those cases, there are
very few who would argue that it was better for these slaves to remain under
the control of their masters instead of choosing freedom. Yet, in this Brexit
situation, the progressive globalists are claiming that it’s better for the UK to
keep their chains on because they have a benevolent master in Brussels. How can this be?
It’s because those who are most
vocal about remaining in the EU are the new masters that lord over others. Take
yourself back to Civil War America. Can you imagine many masters using the same arguments to discourage turning the slaves free? Many of the same arguments
today could just as easily have been made then. Rarely does anyone in a position of lordship over another
give it up easily. The Israelites didn’t have it easy leaving Egypt. They
turned and went back into servitude and found themselves enslaved many times
over the course of history. When we left England, we had to fight for
independence not once, but twice. Finally, we are in a world where the
progressive globalists have been creating a new world order for themselves as
lords over the masses and they are not happy about Britain choosing to rule
themselves.
In America, we see this in our own
election. Globalists on both sides, democrat and republican are having fits and
tantrums, beating the drums of fear, and name-calling, in order to stay in
power. Hillary believes it takes a village. What she won’t tell you is that she’ll
be it’s queen and you her servant. She will promise you a roof over your head
and food on your table, but like the Lord warned Israel, it comes at a price.
Several on the Republican side are part of this movement too. This is why we
have witnessed so many Republicans appear to cave into the left in this
country. It’s because they too wish to lord over others and they want to be
rulers too. They scoff at the libertarian wing of the party who ask for the
very same thing that our forefathers wanted, and that’s liberty. Britain just
chose freedom and we should too.
